Pass the Cisco CCNP Enterprise 300-445 Questions and answers with CertsForce

Within theDesigning and Implementing Enterprise Network Assurance (300-445 ENNA)framework, the transition from "polling" to "streaming" is a major architectural shift. To populate real-time dashboards in external observability platforms likeGrafana,Splunk, orAppDynamics, the architect should utilize theOpenTelemetry (OTel)integration (Option B).

ThousandEyes for OpenTelemetry is a push-based API built on the standardizedOpenTelemetry Protocol (OTLP). Unlike traditional REST API polling (Option A), which retrieves data at fixed intervals and can be subject to rate limiting and latency, the OTel integration allows ThousandEyes to stream granular network metrics as they are collected. These metrics—including latency, loss, jitter, and HTTP response times—are exported in a standardized format that is natively understood by modern observability backends. This allows the platform to populate complex visualizations such as time-series graphs, heatmaps, and multi-metric tables in near real-time, providing a "single pane of glass" view that correlates network performance with application and infrastructure telemetry.

A key advantage of the OTel approach isdata portabilityandcorrelation. By applying metadata tags to ThousandEyes tests, the data can be filtered and categorized within the external dashboard to match the organization's business logic (e.g., grouping by region or application tier). This enables SREs and NetOps teams to quickly identify if a performance dip in an application dashboard correlates with a spike in internet latency measured by ThousandEyes. Options C and D do not provide the streaming data pipeline required for real-time external dashboard population. Thus,OpenTelemetryis the definitive choice for high-fidelity, real-time observability integration.

According to theDesigning and Implementing Enterprise Network Assurance (300-445 ENNA)framework, application health is not just about reachability, but about the functionality of business-critical paths. For an e-commerce checkout process, which involves multiple interactive steps such as "Add to Cart," "Enter Shipping Info," and "Finalize Payment,"Transaction monitoring(Option B) is the most beneficial functionality.

Transaction tests provide a high-level view of application performance by executing a script that simulates a real user's interaction with the site's various components. UnlikeHTTP server monitoring(Option A), which merely verifies that a single URL returns a specific status code (like 200 OK), Transaction monitoring validates that the underlying application logic and database transactions are working as expected across the entire session. If a user can reach the homepage but the "Checkout" button fails due to a slow backend API call or a JavaScript error, only a Transaction test will identify the failure and provide a granular waterfall chart to show exactly where the process broke down.

WhileDNS monitoring(Option C) andRouting visibility(Option D) are crucial for identifying foundational connectivity issues, they are insufficient for monitoring complex transactional workflows. A DNS failure would prevent access to the site entirely, but a "broken" checkout process often occurs while the network and DNS appear perfectly healthy. Transaction monitoring bridges this gap by providing "layer 7" visibility into the end-to-end user experience, making it the definitive choice for e-commerce performance assurance.

In theDesigning and Implementing Enterprise Network Assurance (300-445 ENNA)framework, managing a large-scale deployment of Endpoint Agents requires efficient categorization throughAgent Labels. Agent labels are used to group agents for targeted test assignment and data filtering based on specific attributes like location, OS, or naming conventions.

ThousandEyes supports the use ofwildcards (specifically the * symbol)within label filters to allow for dynamic and scalable grouping. In this scenario, the organization has adopted a naming convention of agentname-network. To capture all agents connected to the "corporate" network regardless of the unique agentname prefix, the engineer should use the filter*-corporate(Option A) in the hostname or agent name field. The asterisk functions as a placeholder for any string of characters, ensuring that any agent ending with "-corporate" is automatically added to the label as soon as it registers with the ThousandEyes platform.

Other options are incorrect for the following reasons:

agentname-* (Option B):This would only match agents that literally start with the string "agentname-", which is a placeholder and not a representative filter for a group of uniquely named agents.

agent*corporate (Option C):This filter is overly broad and lacks the specific hyphen delimiter used in the organization's naming convention, potentially leading to the inclusion of unintended agents.

No wildcard (Option D):Wildcards are a documented and essential feature of the ThousandEyes label system to facilitate automated management in enterprise environments.

By implementing wildcard-based labels, the network administrator ensures that new agents are seamlessly integrated into the assurance strategy without the need for manual manual intervention.

In theDesigning and Implementing Enterprise Network Assurance (300-445 ENNA)implementation guide, the Cisco IOS XEApplication Hostinglifecycle is a critical concept for troubleshooting and configuration management. When an application environment variable—such as proxy settings—is modified in the app-hosting configuration, a simple restart of the container is insufficient.

The correct procedure involves moving the application back to theConfiguredstate before bringing it back toRunning. This requires a four-step lifecycle execution (Option C):

Stop:Terminates the current running instance of the container.

Deactivate:Releases the hardware resources (CPU, Memory, Virtual Interfaces) and, crucially, detaches the previous runtime configuration.

Activate:Re-allocates the resources andinjects the new configuration parameters(including the updated proxy settings) into the container's environment.

Start:Initiates the container with the newly applied configuration.

Without thedeactivate/activatesequence, the container will continue to use the environment variables present at the time of its initial activation, causing the agent to remain offline as it fails to reach the ThousandEyes portal without the proxy.Reinstalling(Option B) is an unnecessary and time-consuming step that involves re-downloading or re-copying the image, whileNo action(Option D) will result in no change to the agent's connectivity status.

56

In theDesigning and Implement7ing Enterpr8ise Network Assurance (300-445 ENNA)framework, configuring effective alert rules is critical for distinguishing between standard network noise and actionable application-layer failures. ForWeb - HTTP Servertests, ThousandEyes allows engineers to monitor both network-level metrics (like Connect time) and application-level indicators (like HTTP response codes).

The requirement is to trigger an alert specifically when the HTTP server responds with aserver error. In the HTTP protocol, server errors are categorized as the5XXseries of status codes (e.g., 500 Internal Server Error, 503 Service Unavailable, 504 Gateway Timeout). To meet this requirement, the engineer must configure a location alert condition where theMetricis set toResponse Codeand the condition value isserver error(5XX)(Option D).

Reviewing the other options:

Error type is any (Option A):While this would capture server errors, it would also trigger for 4XX client errors (like 404 Not Found) and network-layer timeouts, making it too broad for a specific "server error" requirement.

Wait Time is Dynamic (Option B):This monitors the time-to-first-byte using statistical baselining. While high wait times oftenprecede5XX errors, this condition only alerts on latency, not on the actual error code itself.

Response Time (Option C):Similar to wait time, this monitors performance speed rather than the logical success or failure of the server's response.

By specifically selectingResponse Code: server error(5XX), the engineer ensures that the operations team is only notified when the application backend is experiencing a functional failure, rather than just a slow response or a client-side misconfiguration.

In the framework ofDesigning and Implementing Enterprise Network Assurance (300-445 ENNA), selecting the appropriate ThousandEyes agent type is critical to balancing visibility requirements with infrastructure constraints. For Branch A, the primary objective is to gain network-layer metrics (such as latency, packet loss, and jitter) and path visualization for a SaaS application while strictly avoiding any performance impact on employee endpoints.

TheEnterprise Agent(Option C) is the correct choice because it is designed for "inside-out" monitoring from within the corporate network environment. These agents are lightweight software probes that can be deployed on existing network infrastructure, such asCisco Catalyst 9300/9400 switchesorCatalyst 8000 Edge Platforms, using Docker containers or virtual machines. By hosting the agent on the branch router or a dedicated local server, the engineer can execute synthetic tests to the SaaS provider's destination. This approach provides the necessary network vantage point from Branch A without requiring any software installation or resource consumption on the individual employee workstations (endpoints).

Other agent types do not satisfy the specific constraints of this scenario:

Endpoint Agentsare installed directly on user devices (Windows/macOS) to provide "last-mile" visibility. However, they use the endpoint's CPU and memory, which contradicts the requirement to not affect endpoint performance.

Cloud Agentsare maintained by Cisco in global ISP data centers. While they provide "outside-in" visibility, they cannot capture internal branch network characteristics or the specific path from Branch A's internal local area network.

Application Agentis a non-standard term and does not exist as a standalone agent type within the ThousandEyes architecture.

Therefore, deploying anEnterprise Agentwithin the branch infrastructure ensures that the network engineer obtains high-fidelity network metrics while keeping employee devices entirely unburdened.

Introduction to ThousandEyes

This video provides an essential overview of how ThousandEyes agents function within a CCNP-level enterprise network assurance strategy.

According to theDesigning and Implementing Enterprise Network Assurance (300-445 ENNA)best practices, the goal of a successful endpoint assurance rollout is to maximize coverage while minimizing the burden on both IT staff and end-users. The most effective strategy for achieving this is touse a centralized software deployment tool (e.g., GPOs, Intune) that supports silent installation(Option B).

Centralized deployment tools allow administrators to push the ThousandEyes Endpoint Agent to thousands of machines simultaneously from a single management console.12By usingsilent installationparameters (such as /quiet or /qn for MSI packages), the agent is installed in the background without requiring any user interaction or even showing a setup wizard.13This "minimally disruptive" approach ensures that business operations are not interrupted. Furthermore, centralized tools provide a "secure" deployment method because the IT team retains control over the version of the agent being installed and can ensure that the Account Group Token is correctly embedded, which is necessary for the agent to register with the ThousandEyes dashboard.

Contrasting this with other methods:

Manual Installation (Option A):This is not scalable and is highly labor-intensive, making it unsuitable for large enterprises.

Emailing links (Option C) or Web Portals (Option D):These methods rely on the end-user to perform the installation correctly and to have the necessary local administrative privileges. This often leads to low adoption rates, inconsistent configurations, and security risks associated with users running installers manually.

By leveraging existing enterprise infrastructure likeActive Directory GPOsorMicrosoft Intune, organizations can ensure a 100% compliant deployment that immediately begins providing the "user-centric" visibility required for modern network assurance.

In theDesigning and Implementing Enterprise Network Assurance (300-445 ENNA)curriculum, identifying routing anomalies such as BGP Hijacking is a critical aspect of external network assurance. A BGP Hijack occurs when an Autonomous System (AS) illegitimately announces a prefix it does not own, causing traffic intended for the rightful owner to be misdirected.

By contrastingExhibit 3.4-1(Before the Outage) andExhibit 3.4-2(During the Outage), a definitive change in the routing path is observed. In the baseline view (Exhibit 3.4-1), traffic from the Los Angeles agent reaches the destination network 54.239.104.0/23, which is correctly associated withAmazon.com, Inc. (AS 16509). However, during the outage (Exhibit 3.4-2), the path visualization shows the traffic being redirected into a different network:eNET Inc. (AS 10297). At this new location, the traffic encounters100% Forwarding Lossat the node ten7-8.core-2.xlhost.com.

Thechange in the Autonomous System (AS) numberfrom 16509 to 10297 (Option B) is the most concrete indicator of a BGP Hijack. While symptoms such asAvailability Drop(Option A),Response Delay(Option C), andPacket Loss(Option D) are clearly visible in the ThousandEyes telemetry, these symptoms are generic and could be caused by various other issues like physical link failures or congestion. The shift in the AS path—specifically to an AS that does not legitimately host the target's IP prefix—provides the forensic evidence needed to identify the root cause as a routing takeover. This visualization allows network administrators to bypass internal troubleshooting and immediately focus on external remediation with upstream providers.

In theDesigning and Implementing Enterprise Network Assurance (300-445 ENNA)curriculum, understanding the visibility gap between the SD-WAN overlay and the transport underlay is a core competency. The provided exhibit illustrates a ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent deployed on aBranch Edge Routerperforming tests across two distinct paths:Internet(reaching a destination at 64.100.249.90) andMPLS(reaching a destination at 172.29.0.2).

According to the ENNA architecture guidelines, ThousandEyes is primarily utilized to provide hop-by-hop visibility into theunderlaynetwork. While SD-WAN controllers like vManage provide native monitoring for the overlay—the logical IPsec tunnels (Option B) that form the SD-WAN fabric—they often lack granular visibility into the physical service provider paths (the underlay) that carry those tunnels. The exhibit specifically highlights the agent probing the transport networks (Transport VPN0) directly, bypassing the overlay tunnels to measure the raw performance of the ISP and MPLS circuits.

By monitoring theunderlay(Option A), the engineer can identify if high latency or packet loss is caused by a specific hop within the service provider's infrastructure or at a peering point. This "underlay visibility" is critical for troubleshooting SD-WAN performance issues where the overlay may report a tunnel down, but the root cause lies in a BGP routing change or physical fiber cut in the provider network. ThousandEyes Enterprise Agents, natively integrated into Catalyst 8000 and ISR 4000 platforms, allow for this persistent underlay monitoring without additional hardware.

Overlay (Option C):While ThousandEyes can monitor overlay performance, the exhibit's focus on the raw IP addresses (Internet and MPLS) in the transport VPN indicates an underlay test.

IPsec/GRE Tunnels (Options B & D):These represent the transport mechanisms of the overlay. ThousandEyes probes the pathunderthese tunnels to ensure the transport health is sufficient to support the fabric.

According to theDesigning and Implementing Enterprise Network Assurance (300-445 ENNA)curriculum, the native integration of ThousandEyes within the Meraki portfolio is specifically focused on theMeraki MXsecurity and SD-WAN appliances. This integration allows users to install ThousandEyes Enterprise Agents directly on supported Meraki MX hardware, providing critical visibility into the performance of services that distributed users rely on.4

TheMeraki MX (Option A)supports the ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent as a containerized service that can be activated with a single click within the Meraki Dashboard.5This integration is designed to provide better monitoring and testing capabilities for customers interested in improving the quality of their experience and adding the appropriate SD-WAN policies to optimize network performance. By running the agent natively on the MX, administrators can monitor the performance of external applications and services directly from the SD-WAN sites, bridging the gap between local branch health and global internet performance.6

While Cisco continues to expand its assurance integrations across the portfolio, theMR (Wireless),MS (Switching),MV (Camera), andMG (Cellular)series do not currently support the native, "on-box" execution of the ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent. For these other platforms, visibility is typically achieved through passive monitoring viaMeraki Insight (MI)or by deploying ThousandEyes agents on connected client devices (Endpoint Agents) or nearby infrastructure. Therefore, theMeraki MXis the only verified platform supporting native ThousandEyes agent deployment in this context.