Pass the IIA CIA Challenge Exam IIA-CHAL-QISA Questions and answers with CertsForce

When conducting a review of an electronic data interchange (EDI) application provided by a third-party service, the internal auditor should ensure several key aspects to maintain security and compliance:

Independent Review of Service Provider: Determine whether an independent review of the service provider's operations has been conducted. This review helps ensure that the service provider meets necessary standards and maintains adequate controls.

Contractual Clauses: Verify that the service provider's contracts include necessary clauses. These clauses should cover aspects like data security, confidentiality, compliance with standards, and performance metrics.

Ensuring encryption keys meet ISO standards and verifying the use of public-switched data networks are important but are more specific technical controls that might be part of broader reviews. The focus here should be on independent verification and robust contractual agreements

ISO 31000 Context:ISO 31000 provides guidelines on risk management, emphasizing the importance of understanding the external context.

External Context:This includes external factors such as regulatory and competitive environments that can impact the organization’s risk profile.

Regulatory Environment:Understanding regulations helps the organization ensure compliance and avoid legal risks.

Competitive Environment:Analyzing the competitive environment allows the organization to anticipate market changes and manage competitive risks.

References:

ISO 31000 Risk Management Guidelines.

Independence Requirement:The IIA's mandatory guidance emphasizes the importance of the CAE's independence to ensure unbiased internal audit activities.

Conflict of Interest:Seeking senior management’s recommendation for the CAE’s salary adjustment can create a conflict of interest and potentially compromise the CAE’s independence.

Best Practices:To maintain independence, the CAE’s compensation should be determined by the board without influence from senior management.

Standard Compliance:According to the IIA's Attribute Standard 1110 – Organizational Independence, the CAE must report to a level within the organization that allows the internal audit activity to fulfill its responsibilities.

References:

IIA Standard 1110 – Organizational Independence ​​.

Engagement Supervision Objectives:

Assign Responsibilities: Supervisors must clearly assign tasks and responsibilities to individual auditors to ensure clarity and accountability during the engagement.

Approve Engagement Program: The supervisor is responsible for reviewing and approving the engagement program, ensuring that it aligns with the engagement objectives and internal audit standards.

Training and Development: Supervision also involves mentoring and developing audit staff, providing guidance and feedback to enhance their skills and performance.

IIA Standards:

Standard 2340 – Engagement Supervision: Internal audit engagements must be properly supervised to ensure objectives are achieved, quality is maintained, and staff are developed.

Primary Objectives:

Clarity and Accountability: Assigning responsibilities ensures that each auditor knows their role and tasks.

Quality and Compliance: Approving the engagement program ensures that the audit plan is robust and compliant with standards.

Professional Development: Enabling training and development helps build a competent and skilled audit team.

References:

Effective engagement supervision involves assigning responsibilities, approving the engagement program, and facilitating training and development, ensuring a successful audit engagement and continuous staff improvement​​​​.

Authority Source: The internal audit charter is a formal document that defines the internal audit activity's purpose, authority, and responsibility. It grants internal auditors the right to access all records, personnel, and physical properties relevant to the performance of engagements.

Facilities Maintenance Reports: When an engagement supervisor contacts a third-party contractor for maintenance reports, the authority is derived from the internal audit charter, which ensures auditors have the necessary access to perform their duties.

Importance of the Charter: This ensures the independence and objectivity of the internal audit activity, providing a clear mandate for auditors to obtain information from external parties as needed.

Introduction:

Review notes are comments or questions posed by engagement supervisors during the review of workpapers to ensure audit quality and completeness.

IIA Guidance on Review Notes:

According to the IIA, review notes serve as a tool for engagement supervisors to seek additional evidence or clarification.

Options Analysis:

Option A: This is correct as per IIA guidance, once concerns have been addressed, review notes can be cleared from the final documentation.

Option B: Management does not typically address review notes; these are internal audit processes.

Option C: The CAE does not need to initial or sign the review notes, as the engagement supervisor's review is sufficient.

Option D: While review notes must be addressed, they do not necessarily need to be retained after being resolved.

Conclusion:

The correct procedure allows for review notes to be cleared once the engagement supervisor’s concerns are addressed, streamlining the documentation process.

The expectations and objectives of an assurance engagement are often determined in conjunction with the engagement client, aligning with the client's needs and the scope of the engagement. In consulting engagements, internal auditors provide advice and services tailored to the client's requests, which may not always follow a preliminary risk assessment process like in assurance engagements.

Definition of Risk Appetite:Risk appetite is the amount and type of risk an organization is willing to pursue or retain to achieve its objectives. It reflects the organization’s overall approach to risk-taking and is typically articulated at the highest level of the organization.

The board manages several key processes to ensure adequate governance within an organization, one of which is the development, approval, and execution of the strategic plan. This process is critical because it defines the organization's direction, goals, and the actions required to achieve these goals.

Strategic Planning: The board plays a pivotal role in setting the organization's strategic direction, which includes establishing long-term goals and defining the means to achieve them.

Performance Measurement: While the board may establish and measure performance objectives for the internal audit activity, this is part of a broader governance framework.

Risk Management: The board also develops strategies to mitigate risks, ensuring that the organization can achieve its objectives effectively.

Thus, the most comprehensive governance-related process managed by the board involves strategic planning

The internal audit charter is a formal document that defines the internal audit activity's purpose, authority, and responsibility.

Establishing the internal audit activity's position within the organization in an audit charter ensures independence and objectivity by clearly stating the internal audit’s role and its reporting lines.

The charter should be approved by the board and senior management to reinforce its authority and protect the internal audit activity from undue influence by management