In-house teams gain deep knowledge of the organization’s business processes, enabling better alignment between IT systems and business needs.
Combines technical expertise with business insights, resulting in a workforce that understands the company’s unique challenges and opportunities.
Why Other Options are Incorrect:
A. Financial savings: In-house development often incurs higher costs due to salaries, training, and infrastructure.
B. Utilizing state-of-the-art resources: This is typically a benefit of outsourcing, not in-house development.
D. Fastest development time: In-house development is often slower compared to outsourcing due to limited resources.
References and Documents of Information Technology Management:
"In-House vs. Outsourced Development: A Comparative Analysis" (Forrester).
ITIL Service Design and Workforce Development (Axelos).
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit