An organization would like to use a content distribution method that centrally controls content types and versions. Almost all of their endpoints are running Windows.
What type of content distribution method should be used?
For centralized control overcontent types and versions, the organization should use anInternal LiveUpdate Server. This content distribution method allows administrators to centrally manage which updates and definitions are available for endpoints, providing flexibility and control over update timing and content.
Benefits of an Internal LiveUpdate Server:
This server enables administrators to decide which content versions to distribute to endpoints, ensuring that all clients are updated consistently according to the organization’s policies.
It supports Windows environments efficiently, distributing required updates without relying on external sources.
Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
Management Server(Option A) can provide content updates but does not offer the same centralized version control.
Group Update Provider(Option B) distributes content locally within groups but lacks centralized control over content versions.
External LiveUpdate Server(Option D) pulls updates directly from Symantec, limiting internal control over version and content type.
References: An Internal LiveUpdate Server provides centralized control over content distribution, ideal for Windows-based environments.
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit