After a change impact analysis (CIA) workshop, the change manager transitions from data collection to action planning and communication. Option A is correct because driving and facilitating follow-up activities (e.g., communication plans, training sessions) ensures the CIA findings translate into actionable steps to address impacts. This involves collaborating with stakeholders to prioritize and design interventions. Option B is correct as planning and conducting validation sessions with impacted groups confirms the accuracy of findings and secures buy-in, a key step to refine the analysis and build trust. Option D is correct because creating and aligning the result report consolidates workshop outcomes (e.g., impact severity, affected areas) into a formal document shared with project leadership and stakeholders for alignment and decision-making.

Option C is incorrect—while visualizing data and aggregating insights might occur, it’s typically part of the workshop preparation or facilitation, not a post-workshop task, which focuses on action rather than analysis. Option E is incorrect; reviewing and refining KPIs for user adoption is a broader, ongoing task tied to the Run phase, not an immediate post-CIA activity. The change manager’s role here is to operationalize the CIA, ensuring its insights drive the next steps in the change process. This reflects SAP OCM’s emphasis on translating analysis into practical outcomes.

“Post-CIA tasks include facilitating follow-up activities, validating findings with stakeholders, and creating a result report to ensure impacts are addressed effectively” (SAP Activate, OCM Workstream, Change Impact Analysis Process).