The correct answer is B. Bring together a cross-functional group with varied experiences, as explicitly keyed in the uploaded UX Designer study guide.

Consequence Scanning is represented in the guide as an activity strengthened by diverse perspectives. Bringing together people from different functional areas and with different experiences increases the likelihood that the group will identify consequences that a homogeneous team might overlook.

Option A focuses on organizational OKRs. Those objectives may inform product planning, but they are not the consideration selected by the guide for a Consequence Scanning workshop.

Option C places inclusivity examination after the product has already been built. That timing weakens the preventive value of the exercise. The study-guide framing treats consequence-oriented thinking as something that should influence design decisions rather than merely audit them after implementation.

A cross-functional workshop can expose different technical, business, user, operational, and social perspectives. This is particularly important when evaluating possible intended and unintended outcomes.

The main Human-Centered Design lesson is that responsible design analysis improves when teams deliberately include viewpoints beyond the immediate product or design group.

Study Guide reference/topics: Consequence Scanning, cross-functional collaboration, diverse perspectives, responsible design, Human-Centered Design.

==================================