Closet indexing is a controversial practice where a fund manager claims to actively manage a portfolio but instead mirrors an index closely. This practice undermines the very premise of active management.
Lack of Value Addition: Investors pay higher fees for active management without receiving the expected benefits, as the portfolio closely tracks a benchmark index.
Deceptive Marketing: Funds marketed as actively managed may mislead investors, violating transparency principles.
Limited Alpha Generation: Since the portfolio resembles an index, it often fails to deliver excess returns ("alpha"), defeating the purpose of active management.
Regulatory Concerns: Closet indexing raises ethical questions and can lead to scrutiny by regulatory bodies.
Main Pitfalls of Closet IndexingWhy C is CorrectOption C highlights the core issue of closet indexing—misrepresenting a passively managed portfolio as active, leading to higher fees without the commensurate effort or performance.
References:
Volume 2, Section 18: Mutual Funds—Indexing and Closet Indexing.
Volume 2, Section 13: Portfolio Manager Styles—Active vs. Passive Management.
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit