Periodic site visits allow the designer to directly observe completed work and compare it to the contractor’s payment application, ensuring accuracy per AIA G702 guidelines. A pricing breakdown (A) helps but lacks physical verification. Reviewing the schedule (C) predicts progress but doesn’t confirm it. Calling subcontractors (D) is inefficient and indirect. Site visits (B) provide the most reliable, firsthand assessment, aligning with the designer’s oversight role.
Verified Answer from Official Source:B - Participate in periodic site visits to compare progress onsite to progress claimed in the payment application
"The best method to verify a contractor’s payment application is through periodic site visits to assess actual progress against claimed work." (NCIDQ IDPX Study Guide, Section 3: Contract Administration)
Explanation from Official Source:The NCIDQ stresses site visits as a core responsibility in construction administration, ensuring payments reflect completed work per contract terms.
Objectives:
Monitor construction progress (IDPX Objective 3.5).
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit