What is true regarding the number of involved Management Servers in a Management High Availability environment?
A.
You can have one Primary Management Server and one or more Secondary Management Server(s).
B.
You can have multiple Primary Management Servers in a Load Sharing Mode HA environment.
C.
You can have one Primary Management Server and one Secondary Management Server.
D.
You can have multiple Primary Management Servers behind a Load Balancer, such as the Logical Server, but in this scenario, you can only use Round Robin as the distribution mechanism.
The correct answer isAbecause Check Point Management High Availability is built around one Primary Security Management Server and one or more Secondary Security Management Servers. The R82 Security Management Administration Guide defines a Management HA environment as havingone Active Security Management Serverandone or more Standby Security Management Servers. This is the important design point: Check Point supports multiple standby peers for redundancy and database backup, but it does not support multiple Primary Management Servers as a load-sharing management design. The first server installed is the Primary; additional servers are configured as Secondary and normally operate as Standby until an administrator promotes one to Active. Option B is wrong because Management HA is not a load-sharing management-server model. Option C is too restrictive because one Secondary is not the maximum. Option D is fabricated; Management HA is not implemented by placing Primary Management Servers behind a generic load balancer. Reference topic:Management High Availability / The High Availability Environment.
========
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit