Appealing to hearts (emotions) and minds (logic) is a key engagement strategy in the APMG Change Management Foundation, blending rational and emotional levers. Let’s evaluate each statement thoroughly:
•Statement 1: "Actively responding to contributions makes people feel valued" – This is true. The framework stresses that engagement requires two-way communication, where acknowledging and responding to stakeholder input fosters a sense of worth and belonging. For instance, if employeessuggest improvements during a change workshop and leaders act on them, it builds emotional buy-in (hearts) and trust in the process (minds). This aligns with principles like Dialogue and Inclusivity, making it a cornerstone of effective engagement.
•Statement 2: "Decisions are based solely on rational reasoning" – This is false. Appealing to hearts and minds explicitly involves both emotion and logic. The APMG materials cite examples like storytelling or symbolic actions (e.g., a CEO using a new system publicly) that tap into emotions, not just data-driven arguments. Relying solely on rational reasoning ignores the emotional resistance or motivation critical to change success, contradicting the dual-focus approach.
Thus, only Statement 1 is true, as it captures the emotional engagement aspect vital to the hearts-and-minds strategy, while Statement 2 overlooks the emotional component entirely.
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit