Pre-Winter Sale Special Limited Time 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: force70

  1. Home
  2. Discussions
  3. Anthropic
  4. Claude Certified Architect
  5. CCAR-P Discussions
  6. CCAR-P Exam Topic 1 Question 2 Discussion

Anthropic Claude Certified Architect - Professional CCAR-P Question # 2 Topic 1 Discussion

 Anthropic Discussions      Browse All Questions      Go to Exam Detail      Get Premium Access
 Previous

Anthropic Claude Certified Architect - Professional CCAR-P Question # 2 Topic 1 Discussion

CCAR-P Exam Topic 1 Question 2 Discussion:
Question #: 2
Topic #: 1

An engineering organization is adopting Claude Code across 200 developers. A team lead proposes that AI-generated pull requests bypass standard code review for changes under 50 lines because small changes are considered low risk and review capacity is constrained.

Which two Diligence-competency objections should you raise? (Select two.)

Each correct answer presents part of the solution.
A.

Removing review eliminates the verification mechanism required for AI-generated output across the workflow.

B.

Code-review capacity should be expanded to handle every code change submitted across the team.

C.

The threshold should be increased to 200 lines to capture more changes.

D.

AI-generated pull requests should be rejected by default across the organization.

E.

Line count is a poor proxy for the actual risk introduced by a code change.

Get Premium CCAR-P Questions
Actual exam question for Anthropic CCAR-P exam by Riven6477 at Oct 5, 2026, 10:30:50 AM

Contribute your Thoughts:


Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.

Submit
 Previous