Workfront Fusion scenarios can become complex. Adopting practices that enhance readability, shareability, and understanding ensures the scenario can be maintained and used effectively by others.
Option Analysis:
A. Naming all modules by providing short but relevant labels:
Correct. Proper naming helps identify the function of each module at a glance. For example, instead of generic names like "Project Search," use "Search High Priority Projects."
This makes it easier to debug, share, and update the scenario.
B. Insert Note Modules at the beginning of the scenario:
Incorrect. While notes are useful, inserting a Note module at the beginning is not always necessary unless clarification is required for the initial step. Adding notes throughout the scenario (Option C) is more beneficial.
C. Add notes where applicable to clarify what is happening:
Correct. Adding comments or notes helps explain the purpose of certain steps, making the scenario easier to understand for collaborators or when revisiting it in the future.
D. Attach the requirements document using the scenario settings:
Incorrect. Attaching a requirements document might be useful for reference but does not directly contribute to scenario readability or understanding within the interface.
Implementation Tips:
Use descriptive names for modules that clearly indicate their purpose (e.g., "Update Project Status" instead of "Update Record").
Add comments or notes at decision points or complex mapping expressions to explain logic.
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit