Pass the APA American Planning Association AICP Questions and answers with CertsForce

Determining which parcels are surplus requires aligning the decision with the firm’s long-term goals, which are outlined in the corporate strategic plan. Option D (the corporate strategic plan) is most essential, as it defines the firm’s objectives, such as future expansion or operational needs, guiding which parcels are no longer needed. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Administration and Management,” states, “For corporate planners, the strategic plan is the primary tool for determining surplus land, as it outlines the firm’s future land use needs.” Option A (book values) provides financial data but doesn’t address strategic fit. Option B (land use maps) and C (community comprehensive plan) are relevant for external context but secondary to the firm’s internal strategy. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “The corporate strategic plan is the most essential factor in determining surplus land, as it reflects the firm’s long-term objectives,” supporting option D.

The Federal Housing Act of 1954 expanded urban renewal efforts, providing funding forcommunity planning studies (I) and blight removal (II), and creating the Urban Renewal Administration (III) to oversee these programs. The Federal Housing Administration (IV) was established earlier, in 1934, under the National Housing Act. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Fundamental Planning Knowledge,” states, “The 1954 Housing Act included funding for planning studies, blight removal, and created the Urban Renewal Administration, but the FHA predates this act.” Options I, II, and III are correct, making option D the answer. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “The 1954 Act funded planning studies, blight removal, and established the Urban Renewal Administration, but not the FHA,” supporting option D.

The Multiple Nuclei Theory, proposed by Harris and Ullman in 1945, posits that cities develop around multiple centers (or nuclei), each serving different functions (e.g., commercial, industrial). Option A (Multiple Nuclei) matches this description. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Fundamental Planning Knowledge,” states, “Multiple Nuclei Theory describes urban form as organized around several discrete centers of activity.” Option B (Central Place Theory) focuses on the distribution of services, not urban form. Option C (Concentric Zones) describes a single-center model by Burgess. Option D (Sector Theory) emphasizes radial growth along transportation corridors. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Multiple Nuclei Theory explains urban form with multiple centers,” supporting option A.

New Urbanism promotes walkable, mixed-use communities with interconnected street grids. Option C (connected street grid linking residential and commercial uses in separate areas)contradicts New Urbanism’s core principle of integrating uses within walkable distances, not separating them. Options A (architectural mix), B (reduced environmental impacts), and D (smaller lots, more open space, transit-oriented) align with New Urbanism’s goals. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Fundamental Planning Knowledge,” states, “New Urbanism emphasizes mixed-use development within a connected street grid, not separation of uses.” TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “New Urbanism integrates residential and commercial uses within walkable areas, making separation of uses inconsistent with its principles,” supporting option C as the incorrect characteristic.

A design charrette is a collaborative, hands-on workshop where community members work with planners to provide input on a project, such as a park design, ensuring their ideas shape the outcome. Option A (design charrette) is most likely to generate useful input, as it directly involves residents in the design process. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Communication and Interaction,” describes design charrettes as “a participatory method to gather detailed community input on design projects like parks.” Option B (information campaign) informs but doesn’t collect input. Option C (park cleanup) fosters engagement but not design input. Option D (research trends) is a planner-led activity, not community-driven. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) states, “Design charrettes are highly effective for generating useful community input on park design by involving residents directly,” supporting option A.

Creating a community vision involves participatory techniques to engage residents in imagining future possibilities. Visual Preference Surveys (I) allow residents to rate images of design options, Community Charrettes (II) involve collaborative workshops, and Scenario Planning (III) explores alternative futures—all are useful visioning techniques. Design Review Teams (IV) focus on evaluating specific projects, not visioning. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Plan and Policy Development,” states, “Community visioning techniques include visual preference surveys, charrettes, and scenario planning, but design review teams are used for project evaluation, not visioning.” TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Useful visioning techniques include visual preference surveys, charrettes, and scenario planning,” supporting option C (I, II, and III only).

TheAICP Code of Ethics(2022), Section A, Principle 3(c), encourages planners to “share the results of experience and research that contribute to the body of planning knowledge.” Option A (share the results with proper credit) aligns with this principle, promoting knowledge-sharing while respecting authorship. Option B (require reimbursement) is not mandated by the Code and may hinder professional collaboration. Option C (withhold the study) violates the principle of sharing knowledge. Option D (send to the local government) bypasses the consultant and lacks transparency. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) states, “The AICP Code encourages sharing research results with proper attribution, fostering professional collaboration,” supporting option A.

Neo-traditional design principles, often associated with New Urbanism, emphasize walkable, mixed-use communities with traditional architecture and interconnected streets. Seaside, FL (option B), developed in the 1980s, is a quintessential example, designed by Andrés Duany andElizabeth Plater-Zyberk to embody these principles with its pedestrian-friendly layout and mixed uses. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Fundamental Planning Knowledge,” states, “Seaside, FL, is a leading example of neo-traditional design, showcasing walkability, mixed uses, and traditional architecture.” Reston, VA (A) and Columbia, MD (C) are planned communities but focus more on modernist principles. Aurora, IL (D) is a traditional city, not neo-traditional. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Seaside, FL, is the most representative of neo-traditional design principles,” supporting option B.

Subdivision regulations govern the division of land into lots, focusing on infrastructure and layout. Option II (protection against flooding and erosion) is a key concern, as regulations require proper site design to mitigate these risks (e.g., stormwater management). Option III (consistency with public facilities) ensures that new subdivisions align with infrastructure like roads and utilities. Option I (design of buildings) is typically regulated by building codes, not subdivision regulations. The APA’s AICP Certification Exam Content Outline (2022), under “Plan and Policy Development,” states, “Subdivision regulations address site layout, including flood protection and alignment with public facilities, but not building design.” The CPC Study Manual (2024) confirms, “Subdivision regulations focus on flood and erosion control and ensuring infrastructure compatibility, not building design,” supporting option C (II and III only).

Crowdsourcing in planning involves gathering input from a large, diverse group, often via digital platforms like social media. Option C (use social media to enlist a wide variety of input on a planning project) accurately describes this tool’s primary use, enabling planners to collect ideas and feedback. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Communication and Interaction,” defines crowdsourcing as “a tool that uses social media or digital platforms to gather diverse input for planning projects.” Option A (demographic anomalies) and D (transit demand) are analytical tasks not typically crowdsourced. Option B (crowd gathering locations) misinterprets the term. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) states, “Crowdsourcing helps planners gather wide-ranging input via social media for planning projects,” supporting option C.